Annexation is the process by which one municipality expands
its jurisdictional boundaries into that of another. Typically annexations take place when an
urban centre is experiencing much growth and needs to expand to allow for
increased residential and commercial developments.
Given the City's massive growth, we are at the point where
we need to expand our boundaries again. I
see that there are two ways annexation could go in regards to the City annexing
from the County.
1. The Tax Grab
The City could propose to the Municipal Government Board
(MGB) that we take jurisdictional control over all of the developed areas
surrounding the City.
This would significantly tip some scales. The City would immediately have a significant
inflow of revenues from all the assessment that's located there. Tax rates would become more equalized. It would help with regional planning as we
could have a coherent regional plan controlled by one player. Finally, it would give the City additional
developable land to grow. A move like
this would also put us on more of an even playing field.
This is a highly unlikely scenario though. The Province frowns upon tax grabs and would
never approve a proposal like this in a million years. Even if there was the off chance of something
like this being approved, I don't think that having the County develop lands to
then be taken over by the City is a fair policy. I believe there are better solutions to share
the region's wealth. We'll explore these
later on.
2. Development
Potential
The second annexation option is to annex land that is not
developed but has development potential.
This is the option the City has taken.
In 2010, the City and County agreed upon an Intermunicipal
Development Plan (IDP) that identified which areas the City would annex. Annexation negotiations then began in August
2012. A deal amenable to both parties
could not be found so the City and County have sent separate proposals to the
MGB for consideration. The MGB will meet
in October to hear from both sides and then make a decision.
From the City's side, we're asking to annex the full 6,300
hectares that was outlined in the IDP. (see yellow area above). You can read our growth projections here to see
how we justify this number. One of the
determining factors in this calculation was the potential for industrial
development. Currently, the County has
0.21 hectares of developable land for every person living in the County. The City currently has 0.01
hectares/person. Our proposal would
bring that ratio up to 0.05 hectares/person, roughly one quarter of the
County's.
The agreed upon annexation lands include the area where the
new highway bypass will be going through.
Having jurisdiction over lands surrounding the bypass will be beneficial
to the City as there will likely be lots of development springing up there.
I have been in favour of this proposal from the get-go. I believe it solves the availability and
location of land problems. While
servicing the land is going to cost the City a little more in the short term,
the long term pay-off will be crucial as we work to get more development in the
City. Annexation is only a band-aid
solution though. There would still
remain many inequalities in the region.
Thus, I believe other solutions are needed in addition.
It should be noted that annexation battles cost all involved municipalities tons of money, sometimes literally millions, and this money does not provide one service or amenity for anyone. All it does is decide who pays. What a waste.
ReplyDelete